As the article states, "According to National Park Service estimates, there are more than 1,700 wolves living in the Rocky Mountain region—most in Idaho". There is no doubt that the wolf number in this area is not suffering tremendously as some may assume. According to another article I recently read, the state of Idaho is only roughly 100,000 elk. There is a lot of debate on how many elk are necessary to sustain a pack of wolves every year, and to be honest I do not think that there is one single correct answer to that question. However, I do know that the reason Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, and other states have began to allow wolves to be hunted is for wildlife management. The law of nature works by a supply and demand principle and when the the supply is lower than the demand, wolves will be looking for other ways to get their necessities for food.
In the area I live in Idaho, I am fairly close to the border of Yellowstone National park. My whole life growing up hunting, I was always aware of the boarder to the park and the hunting restrictions in those areas. Yellowstone is not a zoo, and the animals are wild, thus they roam freely entering and exiting the park as they wish. I can't tell you how many times we have been close to the boarder of the park and the elk know where they are safe, and where they have pressure from hunters and/or hikers. These animals are quite intelligent and know when they are safe. Since this incident with the "famous wolf" being legally taken just outside of the park, Wyoming has now restricted hunting beyond the park boundaries to include a safe zone just outside of the park ON PUBLIC LAND. I do not feel that this will protect these animals any more than they already are, nor do I feel that this is right to restrict the hunters more than they already are concerning the size of the park compared to their hunting area.
|The Park boundary in the State of Wyoming|
I do not expect everyone to see a problem with this like I do, but I do feel that I needed to at least voice my opinion on the matter. These wolves are multiplying quite rapidly and there are management strategies in place to keep them controlled and healthy. I don't know many people who would rather see a wolf starve to death over one taken legally by a hunter. If those outside of these areas wish to see wolves wander freely, I suggest a reintroduction of wolves in Central Park and other areas where wolves once roamed.
Here is the other article mentioning how Montana has restricted hunting near the boarder of the park.
Great post Kevin! I feel that much of the pro-wolf side of the debate is made by people who are not aware of any real facts, and have very little if any connection to the ecosystem which the wolves are a part of. Great writing!ReplyDelete
I agree Adam, I am often amazed at how many "outsiders" join these debates without knowing the facts or data concerning a balanced ecosystem as you mentioned.Delete
Great post Kevin. If they start including a "safe zone" for the wild animals inside the park... eventually they will know that it is safe for them to venture out further.. then when they cross the "safe zone" onto more public land and another animal is shot... then they'll expand the safe zone.. soon the safe zone will extend across the entire states. Great post brother!ReplyDelete
Great post on this. It seems like news articles about wolf hunts are always a bit on the "conservationist" side and not often from the perspective of the hunter. I think it's safe to say that the wildlife management officials of Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, and other states know what they're doing. There's an entire ecosystem to think about, not just one species.
I would agree with you Dan, I will trust a wildlife management official on these issues over some conversationalist.Delete